I have a similar situation except it takes 20+ minutes (and counting) to
load the database into structures. But that doesn't have much to do with
ASP vs CF.
It's just the consequences of a design decision to spend time starting up
so you can save time when CF is running. (Reminds me of Porche's
philosophy years ago. You couldn't fault Porches for not accelerating very
fast from a standstill, because the Porche design philosophy was not to
waste resources on something you used only once in a race..... Reliability
was more important to them.)
best, paul
At 04:03 PM 9/22/00 +0100, you wrote:
>I think the issue could be the 99% data driven. Not that I know the design
>or anything. Ben Forta at the UKCFUG meeting specifically highlighted an
>issue with a databases. He knew of one site where the application.cfm would
>take 13 minutes to run first time....after that, milliseconds. It was
>literally cahing the whole catalogue for the site into structures to provide
>massive performance gains
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
