GFI is pretty good if you have someone to really spend time managing it. When I was on Exchange, I was using it and I liked it just enough to stop looking around for a replacement. The unfortunate truth seems to be that spam filtering is *almost* purely reactive. You put something in place and then sit back to see how you're going to have to tweak it each day to keep up with the spam traffic. As you all know, there's an enormous amount of money and energy behind avoiding the spam filters. Every spammer wants his email to be the one that breaks through into the inboxes.
But, you gotta have something and if you're on Exchange, GFI is the one I'd choose. --Ferg Russ wrote: >I believe GFI MailEssentials for Exchange uses SpamAssasin internally >(although I believe most solutions do this). You can also set up a linux >box in front of the exchange that runs spamassasin on it (and certain rules >for sendmail that don't accept mail from known spammers), and then forward >the mail to your exchange server. > >There was also a good article in infoworld about spam appliances that are >being offered by some of the vendors, if you've got the budget for it. > >http://www.infoworld.com/infoworld/article/05/08/29/35FEspam_1.html > >Russ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217223 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
