Dustin, First of all I never said you were cheap. I just noted that I was not.
Secondly, your overly dramatic question was preceded by a dirge of complaints. The subject line misrepresents the cost of ColdFusion. You are comparing the pro version against the enterprise version. I think my flip remark is well deserved. You really shouldn't bother looking into hardware load balancers if you are stressed about 10k. They do not come cheap, and you will get what you pay for. (This sentiment also applies to BlueDragon... if your application works) The cheapest redundant ColdFusion application would be two pro servers with an application reliance on client varaiables. (Which is crappy and slow). You mention that these problems are happening on CF7, do you have the option to revert back to 6.1? -Adam On 8/30/05, Dustin M Snell [Network Automation] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dave (or anyone else participating), > > So do you recommend a hardware load balancer for a small 2 server setup > instead of using, let's say NLB in Windows 2003? Our server has about > 3000-5000 unique visitors per day. > > If you would recommend a hardware load balancer, which one would be a good > one start looking at for our size implementation? > > Thanks to everyone for their help, > > -Dustin Snell > Network Automation, Inc > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217224 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
