Well, I wasn't aware of that change in CFMX, useful info. :-) -----Original Message----- From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2005 18:20 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
That was the case on CF5 and lower, because they did runtime parsing of the CF, but with CFMX onward, the CF is compiled on the first request, so the parsing/compiling complexity doesn't have any effect on subsequent requests. In other words, having one or many CFOUTPUT tags only affects the initial compilation, which might make the first request slightly slower, but once it's compiled, there is no difference. cheers, barneyb On 9/8/05, Andy McShane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was always led to believe that putting cfoutput tags around a whole block > of code was slower that only putting the tags around the code that you > wanted output. If I remember correctly it is because the entire code block > between cfoutput tags has to be parsed and that could mean wasting time on a > lot of layout code. Not sure if there is a major difference in performance, > suppose it depends on the amount of code in the block? > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 100 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217655 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
