Kerry, Thats a rather extreme case but you would be slightly better off with the load ballanced scheme. You'd have to set it off once on each balanced server in very rapid succession to kill them all at the same time as opposed to just once on the single server. Its vaguely likely but not guaranteed that you'd get a new server each time depending on how the load balancing doles out the requests so you might have to set it off 5 times to get each server in a cluster of 3.
DRE On 9/30/05, Kerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > some semi-ignorant questions from me: > > >Here the really bad sites would hit each server 1/3 as hard > What if I uploaded an infinite loop? wouldnt that still kill all three > servers in turn? > > Does anyone know if setting the isolation to high in IIS will have any > effect on the performance / memory of CF sites on a shared box? I guess > IIS > cant control the JVM, so no? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 September 2005 22:09 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting > > > Emmett, > Some simple math where we're adding $ instead of things that arent > addeable > quantities like Coldfusion + Clustering + Affordable (WTF?). > > Consider x amount of sites that get y amount of hits and 3 servers to > host. > > If youre a hosting company, you would split them across 3 servers. > So, you've got 3 machines, 3 licences of coldfusion, 3 oses. > > Or, as I was suggesting, you have them all on 3 servers. > So, you've got 3 machines, 3 licences of coldfusion, 3 oses and a load > balancer. > > Here the really bad sites would hit each server 1/3 as hard because they > are > load balanced and you wouldnt get the possibility of randomly getting half > of them on one server. So, the jrun error may not appear as often or very > much at all and you'd generally have happier customers. > > I'm thinking that if this company http://powweb.com can do linux hosting > like this for less than 8 dollars a month then that load balancer and the > extra admin that you consider bizzare are probably quite acceptable costs. > > DRE > > On 9/29/05, Emmet McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I hope I don't offend you but... > > > > We were talking about Coldfusion clustering. Take away Coldfusion and > you > > can definitely find clustered hosting. And since were talking shared > > environments were also talking about affordable hosting. > > > > Coldfusion + Clustering + Affordable = Bizarre Dream World. > > > > -E > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: DRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:01 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Idea for better hosting > > > > thought of this. So I searched for load balanced hosting and found > 588000 > > results. Oops emmett, this bizzare dreamworld seems to occur in your > > world. > > ... . > > > > DRE > > > > > > > > On 9/29/05, DRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Damn your insulting Emmett, Did you read my initial post? It would be > a > > > nice dreamworld if people read carefully. > > > > > > Have a nice day. > > > DRE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:219766 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
