uh oh - we are talking cf5 here. hopefully not for too long, 6.1 is on the
horizon for our production sites, and after we resolve some bugs with 7 and
COM we will be there too.

So here it is, we are trying to do this on cf5 right now.

One more thing is that I have discovered is that unless I specify
<cfprocessingdirective pageencoding="utf-8"> on the page the characters are
displayed in the wierdest fashion.

Does this mean that browsers dont take much notice of this?
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

or is there some sort of hierarchy? or does it have something to do with the
way they were stored?

Thanks for all your help paul - I am a little confused but the smoke is
clearing slowly.

On 10/5/05, Paul Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Duncan wrote:
> > On the collation end, we are looking over 18 languages, I think thats
> pretty
> > much any character under the sun. We have a db table, one column for
> each
> > language, so I am thinking I take Andy's suggestion and make the
> collation
>
> 18+ columns? i'm not sure that wide is the way to go but i guess db
> design styles have changed over the years.
>
> > on each individual column fit the language, rather than simply making
> them
> > UTF-8. Would this be a more effective use of SQL memory?
>
> sql collations have 3 parts: unicode, non-unicode & codepage for the
> non-unicode data. so you should certainly store your data as unicode
> (ucs2 NOT raw utf-8 like the bad old cf5 days, the JDBC driver will
> handle the conversion) using "N" datatypes but you can use whatever
> collation you want (this used to depend on what codepages were installed
> on the sql server, not true for win2k on). the default db collation
> should be the one that covers most of your languages.
>
> just an fyi, collation is a tricky business, there are sometimes more
> than one "commonly" used collation for a language (for instance german
> phonebook vs dictionary) so deciding which one to use (or is "more
> common") will require some research on your part--don't just pick the
> first one in the list ;-)
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:220101
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to