On 10/6/05, Stan Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a preferred type of repository "Native Filesystem" vs. "Berkeley > Database" to CFML projects? >
BDB was the only repository choice for the initial releases of Subversion. Most folks prefer filesystem, which is far easier to deal with for smaller and less busy repositories (say, <50 developers). The differences are summarized here http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/svn-book.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.3 The big issue with BDB (other than fighting version-compatibility problems on *nix boxes) is that it's pretty easy to "wedge" the database, which is no good. {aside: There are actually bugs in the BDB development path relating to svn issues} So use the chart to decide, but unless you have an unusual case, odds are you'll want filesystem. -- John Paul Ashenfelter CTO/Transitionpoint (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:220319 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
