(not sure how far this convo can go, list rules, etc, so tell me if it needs
to stop)

Ajax is great for certain situations. Its only another "technology" at a
developers disposal. Using Flex2.0+Ajax is terribly simple and will provide
some pretty sweet apps, if folks use it right. CF isn't always the best fit
for a job (don't shoot...just being real) but, IMO, its more suited for most
jobs than PHP.

The beautiful part of (swf) [Flex or Flash] vs Ajax is they aren't really
against each other. They both serve different purposes and, IMO, only cross
paths in the area of interface functionality (one-screen apps).

So, as with other technologies...take doses as needed. :-)

On 10/24/05, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i know its stupid! I think its going the way of say flex and ajax but what
> kills me is the ajax ppl saying "well swf's need that flash player and we
> dont want to have to add an add on"
> Last time I checked flash player was on more puters then java, not too
> mention programs such as norton and macafee tend to mess with java on a lot
> of sites. Hell I have had norton cease code on cfm pages with cfform js in
> them......
>
> im sure diff situation call for different solutions
>
> ~Dave the disruptor~
> "Some people just don't appreciate how difficult it is to dispense wisdom
> and abuse at the same time."
>
> ----------------------------------------
> From: "John C. Bland II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:52 AM
> To: CF-Talk <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: OT: Question: How Much of an Interest is there in AJAX?
>
> A good addition would be to see why they are interested. In convos with
> Ajax
> "fans" most don't like Flash (swf's) for many reasons so they treat Ajax
> as
> king. lol. I'm no expert on the matter but being a Flash developer at
> heart
> (and Ajax for that matter...just not as close to my heart, lol) many folks
> have asked my opinion which sparked some interesting convo's.
>
> With all that said, it would be nice to know why they like Ajax too.
>
> 1) HTML abilities still there (right click menu seems to be a big issue
> for
> some folks and Flash)
> 2) Flash hater
> 3) Best thing since pants with pockets AND sliced bread
>
> :-)
>
> On 10/24/05, James Holmes wrote:
> >
> > lol Poll Question - Do you give a rat's about this stuff? 1) yes 2) no
> >
> > I'll see what I can do ;-)
> >
> > On 10/24/05, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> > > I wish there was a way to tell if the reads were due to an interest in
> > implimentation or just to see what's going on. Maybe put a small poll
> next
> > to the article. :)
> > >
> > > > Well, the recent cfajax return types docco I wrote and announed here
> > > > has has 100 reads in a few days, so someone is interested.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:222017
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to