Tony,

A lot of people still use CF5, and almost all our customers CF5 or CFMX or
whatever use Access.

This is of course their choice and has nothing to do with me or anyone else
being under a rock. 


Russ

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 November 2005 17:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..

lets see.

access
cf5

what stone is it that you reside under?

sql server and cfmx7 = the way the light and the truth!

tw

On 11/4/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our CF5 server needs restarting much less often than the CFMX servers.
> Whenever a site using an Access databases gets a lot of traffic and 
> overloads the database with too many connections, CFMX just falls 
> over. CF5 doesn't.
>
> Russ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 November 2005 15:58
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..
>
> Yes, perhaps he lives in a parallel dimension where everything is 
> opposite our reality. CF5... stable... that was a joke right?
>
> -Adam
>
> On 11/4/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps because his CF5 server is stable and doesn't fallover nearly 
> > as much as CFMX.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 November 2005 15:03
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..
> >
> > If you can't see a reason to move to MX from 5, then you may be 
> > hoplessly lost.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > On 11/3/05, Terry Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you are basically a scripter why would you think a move to java 
> > > is A good thing, especially with all the problems it seems come up 
> > > with The java odbc conectivity issues and the ms breaking my java
setup.
> > > I love CF5 and just am reluctant to go to 6.1 or 7. C'mon guys 
> > > convince me.
> > >
> > > Terry
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeff Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:13 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..
> > >
> > > > Why exactly was CFMX6 needed to save the product from CF5,
> > > if that's
> > > > what you meant?
> > > > Just curious as I am still in love with 5.0
> > > >
> > > > Terry Troxel
> > >
> > > I think he's referring to the move to Java.
> > >
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223225
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to