I have a dream that one day I, who have truly immersed my whole mind in
the spirit of the universality of the internet, will be able to rise up
and leverage the true beauty of its creed: "All things for All people
All the time." I have a dream that one day in the black pleather swivel
chairs of innumerable boardrooms the sons of former Webservice Atheists
and the sons of former SOAP evangelists will be able to sit down
together at a table of universal data connectivity. I have a dream that
one day even the state of hard coded spaghetti, a desert state,
sweltering with the heat of inflexibility and lack of scalability, will
be transformed into an oasis of tight encapsulation and loose coupling.
I have a dream that my seven children will one day live in a world where
their web applications will not be judged by the location of their hosts
but by their data connectivity methodology. I have a dream today.

Okay, a somewhat dramatic preamble for the scenario I'm about to pose
and solicit feedback on, but my coding is my art and passion, so it's
only natural that my vision would move me. :D

This is the name of my vision: Universal DataSource. If so inclined,
please take a moment to view the very brief nutshell of my vision
(http://www.universaldatasource.com/uds.ppt
<http://www.universaldatasource.com/uds.ppt>  - 5 slides) so that the
remainder of this post will have some semblance of sense. If you like,
you may also preview a somewhat more detailed description of my vision
(http://www.universaldatasource.com/universaldatasource.doc
<http://www.universaldatasource.com/universaldatasource.doc>  - 4 pages)
before reading onward, too, but that one isn't required.

Let me begin by saying that I have been using CF from version 4 through
7, and fusebox 2 and 3 for a few years. I know how to create CFCs and
utilize them locally and as web services. I have been programming in VB
for several years, have read two books on OO (headfirst patterns and OO
for Management), and so fancy myself to have a solid comprehension of
the subject matter. The extent of my Webservice usage of CFCs is to do
nothing more than return a data set based on incoming attributes; no
methods, properties, etc. being returned by the service beyond the
single data set and whatever default methods come with it. This is my
foundation.

As a proof of concept of my vision (proving to myself that I COULD
create an abstract object using CFCs AND proving that I COULD return
that object either locally OR via a webservice), I created a test
abstract CFC which was composed of several underlying subclass CFCs. I
was able to successfully instantiate the object when calling the CFC
locally. However, when calling the same abstract CFC as a
webservice...well, suddenly we weren't in Kansas anymore, Toto. I saw CF
complaints that were totally unexpected, errors, learned all about the
need to refresh my webservice cache after modifying the CFCs, etc.
Bottom line is I wrestled with it so much and so long that I finally had
to face the possibility that perhaps what I'm trying to do just is not
possible. I turned to Google as usual, knowing that within that plethora
of knowledge exists every question that could ever be asked and its
answer. But alas I could find nothing to substantiate or refute my
vision. And so I turn to my fellow CF and OO people to show me the
light.

The question then:
Is it possible to create a Webservice using a CFC that is composed of
underlying CFCs, and return that composite object to the caller, who in
turn can execute methods, set properties, etc.? 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223885
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to