Whether the syntax is compliant or not, I can't speak on. However, an SGML parser will get confused because of tags like CFELSE and CFELSEIF which break the contents of a CFIF tag into separate blocks, without actually making separate blocks. So it's definitely not good SGML from a semantic perspective.
cheers, barneyb On 11/22/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >><CFSET x = "some text"> > > >>I'm not sure how that proves CFML's non-SGML-ness. HTML allowed > non-valued tag attributes, like <td nowrap> > > <CFSET x = "some text"> looks like an SGML tag, however x here is not an > attribute > defined in the DTD, it can be any variable name choosen by the user and, > although > I may be wrong, I'm not sure this is correct in SGML. > > Otherwise, CFML is pretty SGML compliant. > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 100 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225035 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
