This was my thought as well. Basically, the worst that would happen is that a user might have to log in again if the server they were 'stuck' to went down and they were shifted to a different server. In some applications this could be a problem, but I expect it would not be for most. Is this correct?
-- Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:41 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Pros/Cons Session vs Client scope Isn't it all a matter of how you cluster the machines though? I mean, if you want to use sessions in a clustered environment, you just need to make sure that your load balancer uses sticky sessions. Basically, the goal is not to ever toss users between servers, but just assign users to a server based on the load balancing parameters when they first land on your site. --Ferg ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225154 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
