I would think that a common substring() would be more efficient. Since it would just find "(1" and lop it off. Whereas a regex command would have to validate at each character.
-----Original Message----- From: J W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Regex problem. I know that I can do this with string manipulation but I thought that the regex would be more compact and faster. Am I assuming wrong? Jeff On 12/7/05, Benjamin Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > do you just not want to use string manipulation? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:226430 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
