Terry Ford wrote: > The only potential downside is the overhead required to store and then later > delete the cached queries for clients like Google/yahoo/msn/etc bot sessions. > Between these guys and clients with no cookies, thousands of unused sessions > an hour are created, which means that for sessiontimeout minutes that > cache_query memory will be wasted. Could always manually delete the > variable based on user_agent I suppose. Have never stored queries directly > into session scope, but would be interested to hear if anyone has any > experience with performance of such under load vs using local variables.
From what I understand, the session is created regardless of whether it persists or not. That is, the googleBot makes a request, no cfid/cftoken is pushed, so the system creates a new session for it. So, in theory, you're not actually adding any overhead by using the nonpersistent sessions. --Ben ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:228506 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
