Sounds like a new Open Source CF project for somebody... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've also played with Confluence and I think its awesome, shame its not >written in CF > >Kola > >:) > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Geoff Bowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 11 January 2006 22:32 >>To: CF-Talk >>Subject: Re: eGovernment and Wiki's --- anyone making Wiki's with CF? >> >>On 1/12/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>It sounds like you want a content management system rather than a wiki. >>>The difference being you give people access to edit your content instead >>>of a free-for-all system. Check out Farcry, an open source, CF based >>>CMS. Personally I haven't tried it, but I did attend their demo at >>>CFUnited 2005, and I was pretty impressed. >>> >>> >>Thanks for that :) Not our demo per se just an enthusiastic member of >>the community at CFUnited. >> >>Current link for FarCry community site: >>http://www.farcrycms.org/ >> >>I thought I might chime in to say I've been using a WIKI as an >>experiment for building developer documentation for the FarCry >>community. You can see our efforts here: >>http://bugs.farcrycms.org:8080/confluence/dashboard.action >> >>We tried this in FarCry initially but WIKI and CMS are not really >>equivalent. A wiki is a very niche sort of CMS; very interactive and >>very organis. And although I'm sure we could engineer FarCry to run in >>"wiki mode" I'm not sure about the return on investment given the >>multitude of specialist wiki engines out there. >> >>I'm a late convert to the WIKI seen.. but I quite like working with >>them once you get going. I think however you need the right content >>project and a community of wiki users ie people who know how it works >>or are prepared to learn -- this isn't the general public just yet. >>Navigational concepts get a bit blurry and its important that people >>who really do know what they are doing constantly keep pruning the >>wiki so to speak, otherwise it gets out of hand, and/or whithers and >>dies. >> >>We're using Confluence. Its Java and its commercial (unless you are >>an open source project) but its very much more sophisticated than the >>variety of other WIKIs I've tried to set up: >>http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/ >> >>If you are building wikis you wouldn't go far wrong trying to >>benchmark against Confluence's feature set -- it's really a great >>product. >> >>-- geoff >>http://www.daemon.com.au/ >> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:229332 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
