But cfsavecontent is not a custom tag... it's a built in tag now in CF.  If
they can make it work properly for cfmail, why can't they make it work
properly for cfsavecontent?  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfsavecontent bug?
> 
> Unfortunately, that's how it works.  Every custom tag instance gets an
> output stream (thistag.generatedContent) that it outputs to, and then
> after the end tag is done, the contents of that variable are injected
> into the parent's output stream.  What happens is that when the text
> is written to the output stream, it goes through a filter and if
> ENABLECFOUTPUTONLY is set true and the content isn't inside a
> CFOUTPUT, then the it doesn't actually get written to the stream.
> It's kind of weird how it all works, and the nitty gritty is very
> nitty and gritty, but it's just the way things work, and it's probably
> not going to change.
> 
> If you're really concerned, you might be able to use CFSETTING inside
> a custom CFSAVECONTENT (untested code):
> 
> <cfif thistag.executionMode EQ "start">
>   <cfparam name="attributes.variable" type="string" />
>   <cfsetting enablecfoutputout="false" />
> <cfelse>
>   <cfsetting enablecfoutputout="true" />
>   <cfset caller[attributes.variable] = thistag.generatedContent />
>   <cfset thistag.generatedContent = "" />
> </cfif>
> 
> Of course, that's not going to consider the case where
> ENABLECFOUTPUTONLY is not enabled, but you can probably figure out a
> way to deal with that (do a test CFSAVECONTENT and see if it works).
> 
> cheers,
> barneyb
> 
> On 1/19/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well with cfsavecontent I'm not asking it to output to the html stream,
> just
> > into a variable.
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:07 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: cfsavecontent bug?
> > >
> > > CFMAIL never gets to the stage where you can have CFSETTING
> > > ENABLECFOUTPUTONLY affect it, since the body of the tag is never
> > > output to the HTML stream.  So there's no way to tell if it has an
> > > implicit CFOUTPUT in there, or if it just evaluates hash-encased
> > > expressions like CFOUTPUT does.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > barneyb
> > >
> > > On 1/19/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Well that's what we've had to do, but maybe it's me, but somehow I
> > > expected
> > > > there to be an implicit cfoutput as part of cfsavecontent, sort of
> like
> > > > cfmail...
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Barney Boisvert
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 360.319.6145
> > > http://www.barneyb.com/
> > >
> > > Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230039
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to