Wow, that sounds amazingly like how I interpret and use the Fusebox method.
Maybe it has changed since you last looked or maybe your just a closet
Fuseboxer who didn't even know it. :)
Ken
> Before I respond to that perhaps I should revisit fusebox.org and refresh
> myself on who's behind it. :)
>
> In short I simply meant encapsulating each major functional unit,
generally
> in it's own folder. Last time I read up on fusebox it had a monolithic
> aproach to things (one big functional block). Maybe it's changed though.
> (Reminds me a bit of a rack mount in some ways.)
>
> I prefer to split things up into logical functional units (forums,
products,
> etc) with a well known entry/exit points and interface states. BUT calling
> on css's (and header/footer cfms) from thier parent folders to maintain a
> constant look and feel.
>
> That's all I meant. More organic. Less mechanical. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
