Hi Barney,

 yes, you are right. When it comes to version control with CVS et al.,
CFEclipse is best suited. Thanks for pointing that out. Apart from being
the CF developer, I am also a Java developer and working on Eclipse
platform too. So, I can see the benefits that you describe. Within one
tool, you can move from Java to CF to XML to anything else Eclipse is
supporting. In that aspect, CFEclipse is cool. May be I should find
another Eclipse plug-ins for HTML and CSS for design aspects.

Thanks & Regards,
Pine

-----Original Message-----
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFEclipse Vs Dreamweaver


CFE is definitely targeted at code-centric developers, while DW is
essentially an HTML design tool that has had a lot code-centric stuff
bolted on.  Neither approach is better or worse, just suited to
different people.  The most important difference, however, has nothing
to do with that.

CFE is built upon Eclipse, which brings with it more tools that you
could hope to learn about this year.  You install Eclipse, and then you
can start building the dev environment that you need, not the one that
company X thought you needed.  For example, DW doesn't integrate with
version control, but Eclipse plugins exist for CVS, SVN, Perforce, VSS,
and probably others.  Want XML editing?  There are choices there too:
XmlBuddy, oXygen, MyEclipse's XML stuff, and others.

That's the best reason I see to use CFE over DW.  In all honesty, I
still think CFE is lacking compared to DW in some areas (like snippet
usability), but the external tools support make it WAY better overall.
I might lose 10-15 minutes a day because of stuff DW would make easier,
but I'll save an hour or more with all the other integrated tools I can
use in it.

cheers,
barneyb

On 1/27/06, PINE Phyo Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What IDE do you normally use for CF? I heard a lot of raves about 
> CFEclipse so I downloaded it and use at home. I normally use 
> Dreamweaver at work. Apart from CFEclipse being free, I do not find 
> any considerable edge or advantage over Dreamweaver. (Any CFEclipse 
> developers, no offence please.) Any thoughts on this?
>
> May be I am not using it right but CFEclipse lacks mainly, IMHO, in 
> graphical representation. In Dreamweaver, I can go back and fort on 
> Design view and Code view and most of the HTML component creation is a

> snap. (May be CFEclipse is more geared for pure ColdFusion.) But in 
> CFEclipse I need to type everything in. Well, may be I am not geek 
> enough but just typing everything in for complex UI seem like really a

> chore to me.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Phyo Pine

--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/

Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230647
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to