Thanks for the explanation, Adam...

So, for me, running a single webserver (1 processor) hosting
about 20 sites, only one instance of CF...I would only need
the professional version about $250 USD to host the 20 sites...

Right?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 7:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
>
>
> They used to have a nice graphic that explained how Railo could
> run. After a
> quick run through the site I don't see it anywhere. I think I agree with
> chirs: "1 web server document root directory."
>
> I'll explain it how it would work where I work. We have a nice
> big box that
> we use and it runs Jboss application server. Inside of that we run 10
> instances of CFMX 7. This allows each department to use the same box, less
> hardware and few MX licenses. Since each department has thier own instance
> of CF running it keeps each department, theoretically, from
> messing up each
> others websites.
>
> So if we got the professional version:
> 200 Euro
> + 9 extra webs = 1,100 Euro
>
> Enterprise Version:
> 1,600 Euro.
>
> In USD that's about 250 for one instance + 125 per each
> additional instance
> and about 2,000 for the enterprise. Remember though these figures
> could be a
> bit lower or higher depending on how much the conversion over to
> euro was at
> the time and the broker fee ect. I like to use XE.com to get my estimates.
>
> The way they are licensing Railo is different than many j2ee
> apps. Most j2ee
> apps are licensed per CPU. Railo seems to be going per instance. In
> comparison since our servers are quad processors we have to have
> 2 licenses
> per server from Adobe (but we can launch as many instances as we want).
> Where as we would only need 1 license from Railo for the server but if we
> wanted to deploy a bunch of instances we may go for the enterprise license
> as opposed to the professional licence. At least that is my understanding
> Gert, of course, could mean something completely different and I could be
> completely wrong.
>
> Adam
>
> Adam H
>
> On 2/1/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Just so I understand better...Railo essentially replaces
> > the CF server itself and processes pages, etc., like
> > the server?
> >
> > Also, I asked earlier about Railo's pricing...Gert mentioned
> > that the cost for the "Professional" version would be
> > 100 euros which would handle one "web"...  I was trying to
> > find out if he ment one website or one web server.
> >
> > Can you provide an answer?  Not many details on the
> > Railo site... (hint, hint, Gert...)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:30 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
> > >
> > >
> > > I just want to give a thumbs up for Railo. I've been tinkering around
> > with
> > > it since one of the alphas quite a while back. Its a great little
> > engine.
> > > I've been working with Model-Glue in it for a little while runs
> > > like a champ
> > > from what I've seen.  I plan on putting reactor on it some time later
> > this
> > > week and run some tests  I'll blog about it when I get some
> results back
> > > about it.
> > >
> > > Adam H
> > >
> > > On 2/1/06, Gert Franz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Andy,
> > > >
> > > > Why don't you give Railo a try...
> > > > The free community version can be redistributed.
> > > >
> > > > www.railo.ch
> > > >
> > > > <cfgreetings name="Gert Franz" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > > > location="switzerland" function="railo core developer">
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Andy Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 11:41
> > > > An: CF-Talk
> > > > Betreff: Re: Bluedragon 6.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I want to set up a cheap CF server, in a commercial
> enviorment, though
> > > > the [internal] site won't acutally be generating any money.
> under the
> > > > new 6.2 licence this will break the licence agreement
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 31/01/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Andy Jarrett wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anybody have a copy of BD 6.1 (the free edition) which they
> > > > > > could let me download please?
> > > > >
> > > > > Technically speaking, that would be illegal because you cannot
> > > > > redistribute the free edition.
> > > > >
> > > > > That being said, why would you want 6.1?  Many bugs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rick
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231095
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to