Good stuff... On 2/15/06, FROEHLING, ROBERT (ASI-AIT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here are a couple of performance tests for try/catch, variable > existence, and block vs. script. > > http://www.daveshuck.com/index.cfm?commentID=82 > http://www.daveshuck.com/index.cfm?commentID=83 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:08 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Try/Catch vs. direct error handling > > > While we are talking about try/catch's, does anybody know if there is a > performance hit at all (worth mentioning) when you use try catch. > > The main reason I ask is because I work with someone who uses try/catch > around EVERYTHING HE EVER CODES. He will even use it to terminate loops > and in place of if statements. > For example, instead of a loop from 1 to arraylen() he would just until > an array out of bounds error was thrown, and then move on. > Or, instead of an isdefined(), he will try to access the variable, and > then put his <cfelse> in the catch. > I find this over-use to be excessive, but he claims it is perfectly > rational and has no performance implications to process hundreds and > hundreds of try catch's per template. > > Any light you guys can shed? > > Thanks. > > ~Brad > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232357 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
