Claude Schneegans said: > > The purpose of the exercice would be to remove illegitimate > References in messages sent by > people even ignoring their existence.
And the suggested mechanism would guarantee that legitimate References headers deliberately sent would also be removed. >> The problem with charsets not being preserved > > Who was talking about charset? People that use them have on numerous occasions (both on and off list) complained about the fact that the charset is stripped from the Content-type header. >> The problem with cf-talk email being tagged as spam >> can be attributed to removing header lines. > > You are completely out of topic. No I am not. You asked me to use my imagination instead of refering to RFCs. The fact that I don't have to use my imagination but can point to unwanted side-effects of altering headers that we already experience on this very list should be reason to think twice before adding even more alterations. >> You can choose not to act on a header that is send to you. Fix >> your email client if you don't like the threading. > > If you know one that shows threads but gives you an option to break > them when the subject > changes, please tell me which one. You can modify any of the open source email clients you want, but personally I would look into implementing it in the Message Delivery Agent instead of the client. That way it works the same even if you use for instance webmail. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232686 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
