If you do a <cfexit method="exittag"> in your custom tags then you could do the /> method with them. Although maybe there are times that could not be done, can not honestly think of a time but I am sure there are some. We use a system here that uses a ton of custom tags and unfortunately it is just second nature for me to type /> so I would find myself constantly backspacing through my code, finally just ended up adding the cfexit tag. I have had to do a few XHTML classes, so it has become a hard habbit for me to break when I type out tags, but I doubt many of the things I write would pass the XHTML verification tools.
On 3/9/06, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>It is valid XHTML > > Ah ok. > Personnally, I'll use XHTML when I'll need to, for the time being, > I prefer having all CFML and HTML tags and attributes in upper case, > and all variables and the rest of the code in lower case, question of > readibility, > but of course it is personal. > Closing unnecessary tags also creates trouble with custom tags executed > twice, > so I prefer not using it at all. > One would say that you don't have to apply XHTML rules to CF tags, but > that would > be even more confusing. > > -- > _______________________________________ > REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; > See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm > (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Thanks. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234905 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
