Munson, Jacob wrote: > > This isn't true anymore. The latest release, 0.66 I believe, does > arguments the same way that cfajax does.
That's good to hear. > > Also, the last cfajax release I used before jumping > ship didn't work with Apple's Safari. This may or may not be a concern > for you, but for my site (http://techfeed.net/cfQuickDocs/) that was a > deal breaker. cfajax still has this issue but I recently posted a "fix": http://www.opensourcecf.com/1/2006/02/Getting-CFAJAX-to-handle-Safari-properly.cfm > I like ajaxCFC, there's a lot better support. Arjun is a great guy, and > he's awesome for having created cfajax and giving it to the community, > but he isn't very good at giving support. Rob, on the other hand, is > always very responsive and helpful on the ajaxCFC mailing list. I avoided ajaxCFC because of Rob's restricted open source license. I do agree that Arjun hasn't been providing much support. If he had an official open source license, I'd create a cfopen project and release my own "derivative" work (RabidCFAJAX, anyone?) so that we could have multiple developers working on it as an active project. Given Rob's recent switch the the Apache license, I'm more likely to check it out. rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234914 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
