>>While ActiveX has as much to do with HTTP as it does with the price of tea in China, it is no less a standard than, say, the Mozilla plug-in architecture.
I completely agree with you about both of them. >>And of course, COM has been the standard for Windows program interoperability for many, many years. You know, Windows, that commonly used desktop OS? Sure I know, but it depends if you are developing Windows applications or Internet Applications. For Internet apps, nor ActiveX nor Mozilla plug-ins nor COM are standard. -- _______________________________________ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:236439 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
