> But, it's the antithesis of managed content. There's no reuse > of content. There's little opportunity to apply meta data. If > you have multiple sites, there's no way to let one know what > the other is up to via Contribute itself. > > Don't get me wrong - we make heavy use of Contribute. We > spent a large chunk of last year working directly with the > engineers working out a bug that they didn't know existed > because they'd never encountered an organization that was > managing 100+ sites at a time. It certainly reduces our > workload and helps users control their own content. > > But, _managing_ content - no, not exactly.
I suspect I have a broader definition of "managed content" than you do. Creating a publishing workflow is managing content. Forcing the use of templates, etc, is managing content. But that just goes to show how broad the term "CMS" can be, that it means so many different things to so many people. http://www.psesd.org/weblogs/cm/archives/2003_09.html Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237340 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
