Thanks for the clarification.  I surely thought I remembered one from
when I built my reader.  Hardly the first time my memory has failed
me.

On 4/19/06, Roger Benningfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know there is a TTL equivalent in Atom 1.0/RSS 1.0...
>
> Rob: Nope, there's no ttl equivalent in Atom 1.0. Someone brought up 
> ttl/skipHours/skipDays in the IETF WG (or the pre-IETF group) at one point, 
> and the consensus was that the elements are seldom used, not well understood 
> when they *are* used, and largely unnecessary when HTTP is leveraged 
> appropriately.
>
> RSS 1.0 is a different story. There are probably twenty different extension 
> elements to control frequency out there. But like most RSS 1.0 extensions 
> beyond content:encoded, there's not much support.
>
> --
> Roger Benningfield
> http://admin.mxblogspace.journurl.com/
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238231
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to