>> By the way, this was fortuitous, because I found that
>> 2.0.11 beats the snot out of 3.1.10 for my application.
>> The "new" driver takes 50ms PER VARCHAR FIELD to retrieve
>> one row of data, whereas the old one performs as I would
>> expect, and executes my queries TEN TIMES faster.
>
>Wow. Maybe you should do some googling to see if there are any known
>bugs with that driver that might cause that.

I might, but I found empirically that 3.1.8 and 3.1.12 performed just as badly 
as 3.1.10, so I don't think it's particular to exactly one release.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238384
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to