Well I was not fearful enough to go back and change anything since after all
I have not experienced such slownesses  :)

On 4/25/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do not use QoQ's much at all and threads like this make me
> > fearful of those times I did use it.
>
> I use QoQ for all of my data lookups in cfQuickDocs and have not noticed
> any performance problems.  I think the problem Michael has run into is a
> poorly written query, not a problem with QoQ.  I wonder if he could add
> some indexes to the resultset... ;)
>
>
> ---------------
>
>
> [INFO] -- Access Manager:
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
> and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
> reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
> in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.   A2
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238649
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to