I must have had a modified version of the tag then. Here is a link to CFAJAX, I personally did not like doing related select tags with this because it ended up being slower than the method I had been using.
http://www.indiankey.com/cfajax/ Here is a linkto AjaxCFC: http://www.robgonda.com/blog/projects/ajaxcfc/ The method I use, uses qForms and is similar to the example he has online here: http://www.pengoworks.com/qforms/docs/examples/n-related_selectboxes.htm It probably just boils down to how many records you need to display as to which is faster. What I typically use qForms for is a hierarchy drill down which I would guess involves a few hundred records. I have one that uses AjaxCFC and qForms, qForms for a drill down and then AjaxCFC to pull out some related records for display/selecting. On 4/27/06, Jimmy Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I meant to say: > > > I actually have the most up-to-date code for this. I contacted Nate > > Weiss and he told me that currently his code will ---NOT--- allow more > than > > one 3 select controls. > > > > I actually have the most up-to-date code for this. I contacted Nate > > Weiss and he told me that currently his code will now allow more than > > one 3 select controls. > > > > Is there an example online on how to do this with AJAX? > > > > Thanks! > > James > > > > >I did this years ago with his two selects related tag and from I > > recall it > > >involved no modification to the tag. Might want to check around and > > see if > > >you have the latest version of the three selects tag or it might just > > boil > > >down to how you are calling it. Only reason I mention latest version > > is I > > >know more than one version of the two selects tag is floating around > > out > > >there so might be the same with the three. > > > > > >Your other option would be to just not use that tag and impliment one > > of the > > >other solutions used out there. Depending on how many options are > > used in > > >each element you could just use a pure client side solution or if a > > lot of > > >options which possibly would slow page loads then you could look into > > a mix > > >client/server (AJAX) solution. > > > > > > > > >On 4/27/06, James Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238956 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
