It's mostly for allowing custom tag collaboration, but it's applicable
here to. However, dependance on the environment is a road to tread
carefully. With collaborative tags, it's a must, but recursion isn't
collaboration.
IMHO, recursion shouldn't care about depth. If depth is important,
then an iterative solution is likely a better choice. At the very
least, the depth should be passed as an argument:
function recurse(depth = 0) {
if (isBase) {
// do it
} else {
recurse(depth + 1);
}
}
cheers,
barneyb
On 5/25/06, Ben Nadel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barney,
>
> I didn't even know that method existed... Man, I really need to just go
> through a list of the built in functions to see what I don't know about.
>
> Thanks!
>
> .......................
> Ben Nadel
> www.bennadel.com
>
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:241515
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
