Just so you all know, we use a library for our FTP commands which is rather nice, but the passive is switched off I think (or on permanently, cant remember).
One thing I might have to add is the FTP command list so that you can see why it isnt connecting, it has worked fine for me for the servers that I have used but it sometimes doesnt work with some servers (I am told) and then I dont really know how to debug since I (obviously) dont have access to that FTP server!!! Will see what I can do Regards Mark Drew On 6 Jun 2006, at 04:06, Eric Roberts wrote: > I would say the difference in command availability is a ftp server > configuration issue. Where commands are not available, that is > prolly because the sysadmin shut those commands off. FTP is a > protocol set by W3C. Much like any other transfer protocol, you > can "transmit" it over a secure channel. Is there any difference > in the html for a page that uses http vs. https? It's all the same > transfer protocol, with an added layer of security from a security > protocol or method You put together sftp and ftps...remove the > security...you still have good ole plain text insecure ftp. > > I will look into tortoise once I figure out what the hell Wide Open > West is doing to my internet connection grrrrrrrr > > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 05 June 2006 21:26 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF Studio 5 > > On 6/5/06, Eric Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Its still ftp over something. Just because you send ftp over ssl, >> ssh, tls, or anything else for that matter, it doesn't make the ftp >> part of it any > > > I'd challenge that, if only because I was checking out the FTP bugs > in the eclipse bugzilla, and they explain why it's been lacking. > Maybe you are right tho, and FTP is FTP is FTP, no big deal, > passive or no. > > But I don't think so. Do you have some back-up for your assumption? > Heh. Coming from me, that's funny, I know. [= > > Ever wonder why some commands are available on some hosts and not > others? I think that is part of it, maybe, but my memory is hazy > from abuse. :-) > > Do they make subversion for windows? I would be willing to try it > out for >> size. > > > Yes, there is a GREAT utility called tortoiseSVN. It's AWESOME! > > Some places get overly anal...possibly rightfully so hehehe...and > don't >> allow vpn for consultants. > > > Like Rife, they own all that data in your head too. :-) I get it, > that's ok. > Downtown, workin for the FBI... so many passports... don't even > know my own name... > > to try and install products they are not familiar with. As far as > backup, >> most places I have been have at least daily back-ups...some have had >> hourly backups(incremental of course). > > > It's not just great if you can get it, it's great, period. It's > easy to > get. CVS > has been around for aeons. Blows any type of "backup" system clean > out > the water. Hands down, no questions asked. I can flip through all > changes > made to any section of code from any point in time, instantly - and > what's > better, I can compare it against any other code from any other > point in > time, > even right now, and see EXACTLY what's different, all color coded and > highlighted and even with a little AI thrown in. Or over a range > of time, > even! > (do be sure to back up your repository however!!! :) > > It's simply dabomb, no question, everyone should use/be familiar > with [VC]. > > But those are just opinions, no real facts to back 'em up or whatnot. > Zing! (just kidding, sorry I'm such a punk today! Blame Russ ;) > > ÆòÈ > :denner > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242540 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
