Bryan Stevenson wrote:
>> Yeah but mine is easier to read and understand ;)
>>
>> Rick
>
> LOL...I have a couple Java guys here with big sticks that have a different
> opinion ;-)
>
> Of course I temper them with "easily readable is more maintainable" on a
> regular
> basis ;-)
FWIW, I'm not saying I *CODE* that way, though I should. We all
*SHOULD*. I just don't like tacking on init() calls to the
createObject() calls.
And yet then I'm perfectly happy to write javascript code that looks
like this:
document.getElementById('foo').style.display = 'none';
Which is basically donig the same thing =)
Rick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242719
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
