> Now that's cool to know. That's either really good design on Arjun's
> part or pure luck, since, as far as I can tell, ajaxCFC uses WDDX and
> the CFWDDX tag to write the JS that gets written to the browser (which
> is a really good choice btw) and CFAJAX uses other code. I'm going to
> have to examine this more carefully.

Yeah, check it out.  I don't use the data types that much, so I'm not
sure.  But I know I pointed a guy to your site once, and he was able to
fix his problem.  I just assumed it was because both are based the DWR
library.  I do know that there are a couple of things that Arjun has
implemented from DWR that Rob hasn't gotten to yet, at least last I
heard.


--------------


This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242807
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to