Well, I disagree. If you have your own framework and discover a bug or security hole do you have Hal Helms, Jeff Peters, Sean Corfield and hundreds of other uber-geeks solving it for you?
I have some great applications I'm contracted to maintain that are done in FB3. Yes there are things I like about 4/4.1 but there hasn't been a reason yet to retool them. Greg On 6/9/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, just because a framework evolves doesn't mean you have to > > upgrade. > > Very true, but what if the previous version has bugs you can't live > with? And what if it has a big security hole, and you're forced to > upgrade? And of course, there's always the new features you could > decide merit an upgrade. All of the above could happen if you've built > your own framework, but the difference is that it's much easier to > 'upgrade' your own when compared to a third party framework, IMO. > > > ------------- > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential > and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any > reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission > in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in > its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243049 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
