I guess I could get a plan from hostingAtoZ and put the old
sites under development names and see how they run...well...after
looking at their plans, I'd have to go for the highest plan ($65 or so per
year,
which still isn't bad at all) to get 10 MySQL databases, which still
wouldn't
be enough to test all my sites.  Guess I could just run a site or two, then
put others in their place.


Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Sticking with CF...

I wouldn't worry about it.

I've been using cf since version 1.5 and I can count the number of times
I've used CFGrid on one hand (with a few fingers left to spare).

You really shouldn't run into any significant issues with older code.
As has previously been mentioned, most (if not all) of the deprecated tags
still work.  whether or not you want to change your
parameterExists() to isDefined() or structKeyExists() would be your call.

but as you move forward, you'll probably want to be aware of some of the
better practices that have surfaces (such as using
structKeyExists() over isDefined()) and implement those for new development.

You can get a jump on some of those best practices by looking over Sean's
coding guidelines at
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/wtg/public/coding_standards/contents.html

If nothing else, invest a few bucks for a cheap plan with hostingAtoZ.
 this way you don't have to buy any licenses, and you can take CFMX7 for a
spin around the block, kick the tires, etc, and see just how easy the
transition will be.

On 6/15/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CFGrid...another one of those tags I've never used...guess I have some 
> things to look forward to.  :o)  Ya think?
>
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:10 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Sticking with CF...
>
> As I said, those would require LITTLE coding changes. A var changing 
> to a structure would still be referenced the same way, and CFGrid, 
> ugh, well that's assuming he's using it, it still won't be much to 
> change it. Not like having to change say a cfquery tag throughout the
site.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243688
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to