+1 vote for jsmx I found it easier to get to grips with and get up and running fast than other implementations i tried.
It is nice an flexible in the different formats you can return your results On 6/20/06, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure... > > But JSMX is a LOT simpler to use. And technically JSMX allows you to > return > a string...it's just stored inside a javascript object. I've used it to > return an entire chunk of HTML with no problems. > > <!----------------//------ > andy matthews > web developer > certified advanced coldfusion programmer > ICGLink, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 615.370.1530 x737 > --------------//---------> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:04 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: AJAX > > > > I'd love for the author to allow you to return just a string of text as > a > > simple var. That would be nice, but this way is just one extra step. > > exactly what CFAJAX does ;-) > > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. > phone: 250.480.0642 > fax: 250.480.1264 > cell: 250.920.8830 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: www.electricedgesystems.com > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244257 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
