> The serialized resultset in WDDX will be significantly larger than the > recordset itself. WDDX (and XML in general) is quite verbose.
Yeah, I realized that after looking at the XML generated from it. Someone's blog I found claimed a 250% increase in size. My original intent was just to find out how much of my server's memory was being used to store a large query in the application scope. I haven't been able to find a better way to figure it out. ~Brad ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244307 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
