Good point. I don't know why so many people talk about returning XML via AJAX. That's just one more thing you have to do before displaying the data.
<!----------------//------ andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --------------//---------> -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: FJAX - discuss amongst yourselves > OK, I'll bite. An interesting concept; using Flash to handle > the XML call and parsing in the client/server interaction, > rather than Javascript-based XML parsing. > > Of course, CFAJAX, ajaxCFC and JSMX all use raw javascript to > get the job done (not XML) so a lot of the arguments > regarding XML parsing don't apply to those engines. I also > actually like getting a JavaScript object with which I can > work rather than being forced to get back HTML to use in an > object's innerHTML property. Yeah, the problem here is that you're introducing another dependency (Flash) that you don't need. The "X" in "AJAX" is usually superfluous and unneeded - I never bother actually using XML with XmlHTTPRequest. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244635 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
