Amen, brother. CFX_ImageCR3 rocks, and it's rock-solid. Been using it for years on image processing-heavy sites with no problems. And the image quality at higher compressions beats anything else on the market.
Highly recommend it. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# & ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Chad Gray To: CF-Talk Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: RE: Image processing ImageCR3 has no limit and it has never crashed our server. I am in the printing industry and I use ImageCR exclusively for our web based image re-purposing needs. I have a web based image approval system for our photography studio that currently has more then 5000 2500px X 2500px "master" images in it (1.5gigs of images). For this application ImageCR has been used to generate all of the different resolutions off of these "master" images that I needed for the web app (stuff like thumbnail images, preview images etc.). The "output" folder for this web app that ImageCR3 uses to store the generated images contains more then 12000 images. It just works. A tool that I set and forget. -----Original Message----- From: Justin Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 2:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Image processing Luis, > why you will going to change to the Alagad Image Component I'd like to switch to Alagad mostly due it's CFC'ness and the fact that it's all native java within cf. Also, the 500 image limitation we ran into w/ imagecr3. Other than that, I have no "real" reasons. I plan to do the prudent testing and research against both options the next time this topic comes up. Right now, I just don't have the time. ImageCR3 is very good. Pros: fast, flexible, reliable. Cons: 500 batch limit, if you give it the wrong combo of attributes you can take down cf :( but that's stuff you work out in the development phases of your projects. If you are still trying to decide, download the eval editions of both and run some tests on the exact functions you need to perform. I'd be interested in the results. Justin Hansen Project Manager Uhlig LLC -----Original Message----- From: Luis Rueda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 3:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Image processing Hello Justin, i am interested in your experience, why you will going to change to the Alagad Image Component, at the time we will have the necessity to do some image manipulation and want to start with a good solution principally in terms of CPU usage and image manipulation speed, thanks for your comments. Luis Rueda Bizglo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244862 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
