All of the CFAJAX problems that have been mentioned have yet to be fixed in any new release. Not only that but the CFAJAX Wiki seems to have been trashed recently, because the articles are now different and the front page doesn't work like it did.
I'm planning a move to another platform - I'll compare ajaxCFC and JSMX to see which has the features I'm after. On 7/8/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool, not really interested in Safari support (intranet app) but the support > is certainly a bonus. > > > > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri Jul 07 20:56:47 2006 > Subject: RE: AjaxCFC or CFAJAX > > Personally, I prefer ajaxCFC for 3 reasons. Easy installation, Safari, > and good support. I've heard that someone posted a Safari fix for > CFAjax, but as far as I know it's still not in the official release. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:31 PM > > > > Which is the better? The more robust etc... What would you > > use if you had > > to? > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential > and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any > reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission > in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in > its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:245790 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
