Nice analogy ;) It would also limit the amount of times the same discussion occurs (or is it recurs), although it is fun to watch the frameworkswar.
Munson, Jacob wrote: > Yeah, that does sound like a good idea. Especially if this new FAQ were > publicly available, so that people that don't want to drink from the > firehose (i.e., subscribe to cf-talk) can still access it. :) > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246307 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
