Ben Nadel wrote: > Jeff, > > I tend to use this doc type: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > > This is for several reasons: > > 1. I like to "believe" that I can create an xhtml standard compliant > website... Sometimes that is wishful thinking, but I aim high. > > 2. It actually changes the way the browsers render code in newer browsers > and I am now used to writing code that is appropriate for that doc type (ex. > in xhtml images have line-heights unlike earlier versions which will put > "padding" around the image even if it has a break after it). > > Mostly though, its just about moving forward, staying with the times, and > working towards standards. We at our company work the same way, using xhtml 1.0 transitional (occasionally even strict) and make sites validate through w3c. When they validate we test in different browsers, then we're done. (ok that last part was wishful thinking on my part.)
Mingo. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246419 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
