Don't debate - do.





"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Jul 18 17:23:22 2006
Subject: Re: Low-tech asychronous call to ColdFusion

Yeah, we did cfthread tag in about a day...we're debating whether to toss it
out there as an open source project...

Damon

> Hmmm...sounds like a perfect use of the new CFTHREAD tag in BD 7.0:
> 
> http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.
> cfm?mode=entry&entry=152A1ECC-B7C2-5C0D-4269B203A722C055
> 
> Vince Bonfanti
> New Atlanta Communications, LLC
> 
> > I am aware (somewhat!) of the asynchronous Web services capability 
> > with CFCs in ColdFusion. What would listers recommend if I simply 
> want 
> > to call a ColdFusion action page asynchronously. The asychronous 
> call 
> > is a one-way trip and does not require data back to the caller.
> > 
> > Here's the scenario briefly: I have a sign-up form that calls an 
> > action page, but the action page does a lot of heavy lifting with 
> > numerous queries and loops. The page takes about 15 seconds to run, 
> 
> > the result of which is an autogenerated e-mail link with an 
> autologin 
> > to an application environment.
> > 
> > I echo back an acknowledgement page immediately while processing 
> > continues on the action page. What I have will work since the thread 
> 
> > will continue to run even if the user click away from the page, but 
> I 
> > would prefer that the thread would run asychronously and not appear 
> to 
> > be tying up the page.
> > 
> > I would prefer to not go the CFC route, but I am open to persuasion.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Paul Fraser
Minneapolis



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246907
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to