CFTHREAD & CFJOIN proof of concept tags for CF7 posted:

http://www.dcooper.org/blog/client/index.cfm

Damon

> FYI, just doing some testing on these tags (cfthread and cfjoin) and I 
> hope to have them posted on my blog today or tomorow.  They'l require 
> CF7, but Standard Edition is fine (Enterprise not required).  
> 
> Using the these tags with CF7 won't give you the thread pooling and 
> other fine-grained control, such as the number of dedicated threads 
> for processing, etc that you get with the Async Gateway and Event 
> Gateway architecture, but hopefully they'll still be useful.
> 
> Glad to see our developers used their plane ride back from CFUNITED 
> constructively :)
> 
> Damon
> 
> > Not sure, "TBD" :)  (don't need to stinkin hell raining down on me! 
> :) 
> > 
> > 
> > Let me just say that there's nothing (*technically*) that ties it to 
> 
> > the gateway infrastructure...
> > 
> > Damon 
> > 
> > >So, would this still be an Enterprise only feature then? Or would 
> > the
> > >tag be usable in Standard? (You do realise that if you say Ent 
> only
> > >then all hell will reign down upon you from others currently 
> > watching
> > >this thread :)
> > >
> > >Andy
> > >
> > >On 18/07/06, dcooper @ macromedia. com dcooper @ macromedia. com
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247282
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to