> OK, I ran cftimer on both examples, iif and the if/else way, 
> and both came 
> back 0 ms.  So I think in this case, since it's only looping 
> over 10 list 
> items or whatever, I'll stick with the leaner code.  Maybe if 
> you were 
> looping over thousands of list elements or query rows or 
> something, there'd 
> be a more noticeable performance hit.

Interesting.  However, if your app ever need's to scale, it /could/ end
up being thousands of list elements, if hundreds of people are firing
that code simultaneously.  That's why I usually try to simulate some
traffic by putting the pieces of code I want to test in a loop that runs
thousands of times.  It's not the best way to test (a load tester would
be better), but it gives you a better idea.  Of course, none of this is
relevant if you know your app will never have that much traffic.  :)


-------------

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247387
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to