On 7/24/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul, > > Again protected constructor not a class and the source says its empty > (I posted that too didn't you see it?) and its a default constructor i.e no > way around not calling it unless you use a static method. > > Its was the fastest way I could provide an example without searching around > for a for a better example which showed an error while instantiating an > object which most people will do first > before calling a method. > > Clear? >
Not in the slightest. What you call and error is not an error - it's a basic principle of a language. In Java you cannot even *compile* a class that attempts to call a private or protected method, so I can't see how this could be an 'error'. I'm sorry, but unless you can explain yourself better, this isn't making any sense to me at all. Mark -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247453 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
