I have not messed with GetMetaDAta much but I'd imagine
GetMetaData(Instance[Arguments.MethodName]) would work. I ran into a case
not too long ago when I had to use evalutate for some method calls but it
was because I was trying to stay in cfscript, had I been using a cfinvoke I
am pretty sure I could have avoided it.
Typically anytime you are doing Evaluate("something." & somethingelse) you
can avoid Evaluate() via using what I always refered to as the structure
bracket notation. Of course this could get into a long drawn out debate on
whether avoiding Evaluate() is even worth it now days in MX. I just avoid
it out of habbit and style choice more than anything else these days.
On 7/25/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Will have to dig in my code - I suppose the question to the gurus etc is
> can you 100% dispose of using evaluate?
>
> One example I think I have is
>
> GetMetaData(evaluate('instance.' & arguments.methodName))
>
> Or
>
> evaluate('attributesStruct.#attributeName#')
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
> Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
> confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of
> the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please
> note
> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or
> call
> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within
> this
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: CF-Talk <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue Jul 25 20:50:39 2006
> Subject: Re: Cool feature I didn't know about
>
> Any examples of where you could not see a way around it?
>
>
> That is a neat trick with the ArraySum although I'd guess the number would
> be all out of whack if you are doing grouped(CF not SQL) output.
>
>
> On 7/25/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Examples? Sometimes I hate using evaluate but I sometimes cannot see a
> way
> > around it!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:247686
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4