Public perception is not a problem...I'm hosting a non-public office application for an insurance agent, which will have no pages for the public to view.
A "self-signed" certificate offers the same security as one that I purchase? Rick -----Original Message----- From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 10:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SSL Certificates On 8/7/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Dave...some reading I was doing after posting finally > confirmed that I would have to have 1 certificate for each domain, or > either purchase a multiple domain (up to 4 domains) certificate for about $500! > > Rick > I would do some shopping around, as there is some level of competition with certificate authorities these days. I know godaddy is offering certificates for 20 bucks, but I don't know if those throw up any warning messages in your visitor's browser. If the domains (or the secure portions of them) aren't something where public perception is a problem, you might look at using a self-signed certificate, or something like cacert.org (their main site seems to be down right now, but you can look at the wiki... http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/). If it is something where public perception is a factor, then I'd probably pay the VeriSign tax. -- Jim Wright Wright Business Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] 919-417-2257 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:249099 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
