First off, I personally hate it when people do this kind of crap. However, I certainly do understand where it comes from. I've had tons of clients want to this kind of thing to "protect" their content.
I agree that this approach is pointless when the people looking at the screen are experienced developers and/or power web users. However, I'd be willing to bet a large amount of money that I know 10 intelligent people who couldn't figure out a way around this without spending quite a lot of time on it. In the mind of said marketing muppet, that's good enough. An experienced thief doesn't care if your car door is locked and you've got the club on the wheel, but John Q. Thugly is likely not going to be able to make off with your ride, as he happens by and takes a liking to your paint job. --Ferg -----Original Message----- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:30 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: site that can't be copied This kind of approach is so pointless. There is no way to stop someone copying content. This has no doubt been asked for by some marketing muppet. Idiots. If you don't want people to copy content online, don't put it online. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:249438 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
