This going to replace cfajax? What benefit is there to this than cfajax?
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: James Holmes To: CF-Talk Sent: Thu Aug 31 07:59:36 2006 Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? MXAJAX supports CFC calls in a very similar fashion to AjaxCFC, but it's based on Prototype, JSON, Sciptaculous and AjaxTags. On 8/31/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Done a lot of POC work with Backbase. > > With people not using CFAjax or AjaxCFC are you still using CFC calls in > your Ajax? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251582 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
